Toxic Exposures: Mustard Gas and the Health Consequences of World War II in the United States

by Susan L. Smith

By Tadzio Richards

Rutgers University Press
2017/$48.00/200 pp.

Surely,” asserts Susan L. Smith at the end of her meticulously researched and thought-provoking Toxic Exposures, “the history of the mustard gas experiments during World War II provides a powerful lesson in why such medical experimentation necessitates public scrutiny and public debate.” Indeed. During the war, at Suffield, Alberta, groups of 60 Canadian soldiers at a time were told to gather while Canadian military planes sprayed mustard gas—a “bluish rain”—over the men. “They didn’t tell us what it was or to put on respirators,” recalled a soldier. On other occasions, groups of six soldiers were put into a windowless bunkhouse that was then filled with gas. One time live rabbits were also put in the “gas chamber” with the men. The rabbits died. In these and thousands more toxic gas experiments performed on soldiers at Suffield and other Allied research locations during the war—medical experiments conducted with “utter disregard for the harm inflicted on the servicemen”—Allied soldiers were injured with badly blistered faces, limbs and groins. The experiments left a legacy of human suffering and government denial, along with toxic dump sites in Canada and around the world. They also played a key role in the discovery of chemotherapy treatments for cancer.

Smith, a University of Alberta history professor, has written a detailed account of this complex and shocking history. During the Second World War the Allied nations worried that Germany would use mustard gas as a weapon, as it had done in the First World War. “Government officials, military leaders and scientists,” writes Smith, “treated the southern Alberta prairie as an unlimited resource for field trials” for weapons testing, including the effects of gas on soldiers. Basic ethical requirements for research weren’t established until after the war, and at Suffield and elsewhere, military scientists experimented on humans—including race-based experiments, particularly in the US—justifying it as for “the greater good.”

Ironically, the only time mustard gas was used in the war was when a US destroyer carrying the gas in secret was blown up in a harbour at Bari, Italy, badly injuring thousands of Allied soldiers. In a report on the incident, a US military doctor noted that victims also suffered damage to the lymphatic system and bone marrow. He theorized the gas could be used to treat cancer, a key insight in the development of chemotherapy—essentially “poison with anti-cancer side effects.” This accidently fortunate outcome resulted from treating people and land as expendable. It’s a cautionary tale that should be widely read and discussed.

Tadzio Richards is an associate editor at Alberta Views.

RELATED POSTS

Orange Chinook:

The NDP’s victory in the May 2015 Alberta election stunned many Albertans and Canadians, even many party supporters. The shock was not so much at the PCs’ defeat, but rather that it came at the hands of the social democrats. Edited by Mount Royal University professors Duane Bratt, Keith Brownsey ...

Firewater:

One of the many Canadian communities hit hard by the ongoing fentanyl debacle is Standoff, Alberta, headquarters of the Kainai (Blood) First Nation, where a state of emergency was declared in 2015 to try and get control of the crisis. It is sadly ironic that Standoff should make the news ...

Homes

For more years than most of us have been alive, desperate people have been trying to escape from homelands no longer safe, in the sometimes unjustified hope that some other country will take them in. It would seem that the story of the refugee is the quintessential narrative of our ...